Jump to content

"Five Tool Players"


PaulMaul

Recommended Posts

As every baseball fan knows, a "five tool player" is one who has it all: hits for average, hits for power, plays defense, throws runners out, and has speed.

Let's call a "five tool player" in music someone who simultaneously excels at:

1. singing

2. writing lyrics

3. writing melodies

4. playing an instrument

5. arranging songs

Five tool players in music are pretty rare. We're all a bit biased, but Eric Carmen seems to be one. 1,3 and 4 (piano) are pretty much slam dunks. I would argue that he's at least a very good to great lyricist. And, while not going it alone, I'm pretty sure the buck stops with Eric when it comes to arrangements of his songs (correct me if wrong).

Who else is a five tool player? I honestly am having trouble thinking of any. It's debatable, but I don't believe any of the Beatles are technically great players, though they're very good at what they're going for. Pete Townshend, to me, neither a great singer nor a great guitarist. Elton John, not a lyricist.

Anybody have someone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Uh Paul is one of the greatest bass player ever...and all were excellent players.

I figured many would say that. Of course, it all comes down to opinion, and what you classify as an "excellent player." Obviously, John Lennon would not have been able to play Rachmaninoff. I'm not saying that makes him a bad player, but how exactly are we to judge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John was mainly a guitar player, and an excellent one at that...Paul is one of the best bass players ever.

Listen, I love the Beatles, and I'm not trying to start an argument. But I hear all the time that Paul is one of the best bass players ever. And I just wonder how that's being concluded? I'm limiting this "tool" to sheer technical excellence on an instrument. Please cite a Beatles song that illustrates excellent technical bass playing by Paul (not writing a bass part, or writing a song).

I disagree with you completely, learning a classical piece is exactly the kind of thing that illustrates technical excellence. Forget about songwriting, that's a completely different category.

The one wildcard I guess is what you consider "technical excellence." It's obvious to me that Geddy Lee is a better "technical" bass player than Paul McCartney, but I'm sure you will laugh at that, so I'm not sure how to argue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How's this...Paul McCartney is judged by his peers to be one of the alltime greats...Listen to Rain, Good Lord Paul is the greatest melodic bass player ever...I mean if you are familiar with the Beatles catalog and can't figure out what a great player Macca is...we've got nowhere to go.BTW, my ex wife can play Rachmaninoff. LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hollies, behave yourself!!!!!!

It's OK to lose an argument to Paul. We'll still love you!!..besides you should have plenty of practice losing arguments by now (you've gone down to me so many times you ought to be numb to it by now..)

:-)

So let's all hold hands and think about world peace (though I'll be thinking about Hillary..)

:-(

Anyway, here watch this one, it's a piece of genius we can ALL agree on. Oh yeah.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9TOitV21XE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you play anything?

Let's see:

Guitar

Pennywhistle

Great Highland Bagpipe

Look, it's all in how you define things. To me, if someone is a technically excellent player, then it would be difficult for other players to imitate their performance effectively. That's all I mean by technical excellence. Please, take composing and writing out of it, if you haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's silly, a good guitar player can learn practically anything. BTW,you're the only person I've ever heard of with that description technically excellent.Your definition of technically excellent is silly. The world is full of excellent technical players.The beatles had 4 in their band. You may want to look up virtuoso in the dictionary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's silly, a good guitar player can learn practically anything. BTW,you're the only person I've ever heard of with that description technically excellent.Your definition of technically excellent is silly. The world is full of excellent technical players.The beatles had 4 in their band. You may want to look up virtuoso in the dictionary.

Sorry, I've lost you. "A good guitar player can learn practically anything." OK, then if you think Lennon is a good guitar player, do you think he could have learned complex classical pieces? I don't. I don't think he had the technical training.

I don't understand why it's an insult to suggest that the Beatles weren't great technical players. They were flawless on almost every other level. Why can't Neil Peart be a better drummer than Ringo without it rocking everyone's world? The Beatles didn't need to be the best technical musicians to be arguably the best band ever.

I just listened to "Rain." As expected it's a fantastic song. I don't hear anything from Paul that couldn't be duplicated by hundreds of bass players. Sorry, I don't see anything here that qualifies as virtuosity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouring the internet for discussions of the "best bass players" solidifies my point. All of the praise Paul McCartney gets has to do with being "innovative," "melodic," etc. These are all attributes of his compositional skills. They have nothing to do with playing. Let's be precise in separating playing from composing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John lennon was a rythmn player. I mean you understand this right...and he's a technically excellent rythmn player...you're a guitar player right? Post a video of you playing the rythmn part of "All My Loving". Get it? Paul McCartney is one of the greatest melodic bassist ever.You do understand what I mean by Melodic lines? He writes the songs...which are uniformally great...and supplies beautiful and imaginitive basslines for them.Stuff that your boy from Rush could never...and has never come up with...I feel like I'm talking to someone who does not understand. Don't worry..I'll point this thread out to some of the players here tomorrow. I know Eric[And the vast majority of real players] has a VERY different opinion on Paul's bass playing than you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh lands!!!!

Heck with the earthquake in New Zealand. We've got our own earthquake right here!

It's "Earthquake Hollies"!

Gosh!

Ok Paul, try to stay cool (as you have been so far). And try not to feel too bad. Remember: if Jesus came down here, Hollies would argue with him too. Jesus wouldn't escape being called "silly" nor would he escape the dreaded "hahahahahahahahahahah..........." or the lethal "Heh".

I shudder to think about it.

Anyway, my advice is to keep some perspective.

Remember - there are many greats in history, that have come before you, that have been RIGHT, but still scorned by their messageboard contemporaries:

For instance:

Socrates of Athens

Paul The Apostle

Joan of Arc

Galileo Galileo

St. Thomas More

Honest Abe Lincoln

James of EC.Com

Being in this fraternity should give you some solace.

Sincerely,

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Announcements


×
×
  • Create New...